• Home
  • Lumpy Mail Experts
  • Damn Good Writing
  • Need a Speaker?
  • Clients
  • Links
  • RESPONSE Agency Blog
  • Talk to Us
Are you guilty of this graphic design sin? 07/21/2010
1 Comment
 
Upon a friend’s foolhardy request for my thoughts on his website, I observed that his use of reverse type — white type on a dark background — was hard to read. Reverse type cuts readership by almost half. He agreed to change it, adding that he’d used reverse type because he thought it would be “fun and artsy.”

No argument there. Reverse type is visually stunning. There are lots of other stunning things designers have been known to do with type as well: shape it, swirl it, turn it upside down, rotate it, mirror-image it and more. Just one problem. All of these shenanigans make the copy hard to read. 

Readers don’t start out terribly interested in what you have to say. If you make it hard for them to find out, most won’t bother. So on the assumption that you have written good copy that is there for a reason, making it hard to read would seem counterproductive. 

Do not fall for the oft-raised defense that doing unique things with type draws attention to it. Maybe it does. But if no one can read it, to what avail? Nor should you fall for the notion that hard-to-read type presents a challenge to which readers will rise. That is utter nonsense.

Put your copy where eyes expect to find it, and they will. If you want eyes to go to the next step — that is, actually read it — use black or very dark type on a white or very light background. Choose a high-legibility font with serifs, which is easier to read than sans serif type. While you’re at it, keep your paragraphs short. 

Use of reverse and sans serif type is sometimes allowed for brief headlines and subheads. Otherwise, stick with these rules and you will increase readership. By the way, when you increase readership of your advertising, guess what happens to your sales.

—Steve Cuno
 


Comments

towr
07/22/2010 09:35

I don't think the same rules apply to print and screen. The recommendation I have always heard was to use serif for print, and sans serif for screen. (And using CSS you can set it so that print uses other font than screen viewing. Creating the optimal experience in both cases.)

Actually, do you know if there are any studies about this? I mean, I think I know what professional webdesigners recommend, but they might still be wrong.


As for color, black text on a white background tends to make my eyes tired after reading for a while. Personally, I'm quite partial to light gray on black.
But let's get serious here, we're on the web. You can give your visitors a choice; you don't need to dictate how they will see your website. Give them a button to change the font, the size, even a few color-schemes. You can't do that with print, but this is the 21th century.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply

    RESPONSE Agency Blog
    RESPONSE Agency - direct mail and lumpy mail experts Salt Lake City Utah

    RSS Feed

     | 
    Follow SteveCuno on Twitter
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Click here to read Steve Cuno's column in Deliver Magazine
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Looking for older posts? CLICK HERE.
    Picture
    Click here to read the official newsletter of the James Randi Educational Foundation, for which Steve Cuno is an occasional writer.

RESPONSE Agency, Inc. • 936 Granite Peak Drive Suite 1100 • Sandy UT 84094 • Phone 801-352-9100 • Email info@ResponseAgency.com